Skip to main content

The Cowardice of Corporate Jargon

Picture this: an email lands in your inbox. A colleague—maybe even a friend—needs a favor, a second set of eyes, a moment of your time. You sigh, stare at the glow of your monitor, and type:

“I’d love to help, but I just don’t have the bandwidth right now.”

Hit send. Problem solved. Conscience clear.

Except it shouldn’t be. Most of us have said or sent that line at least once, hoping it would land gently.

On the surface, it’s perfect—efficient, polite, even self-aware. And that’s exactly the problem. It lets you decline without ever quite telling the truth. You didn’t just say no; you softened the discomfort of being human until it barely felt like a feeling at all.

Instead of admitting, I’m overwhelmed, or I don’t have the energy, you reach for the sterile vocabulary of a server room. You turn a feeling into a metric. A boundary into a system limitation.

Apologies, my data transfer rate is capped. Please submit a ticket to my emotional help desk.

It’s a clever little trick—and an understandable one. It spares us a moment of awkwardness. It just costs us a little honesty.

Bandwidth didn’t start this way. In the late 1800s, it belonged to radio engineers. By the 1990s, it was what the cable guy blamed when your AOL connection crawled. But as tech culture swallowed everything else, we started borrowing its language to describe ourselves. We “process” emotions. We download after meetings. We recharge.

Henry David Thoreau saw the danger long before Wi-Fi:

"But lo! Men have become the tools of their tools."

He wasn’t just warning about hammers and machines. He was warning about what happens when we let our tools reshape how we think—and, eventually, how we speak about ourselves. We stop describing our experience and start translating it into something cleaner, flatter, less human.

Because “I don’t have bandwidth” sounds better than “I’m at my limit.” It sounds controlled. Professional. Unimpeachable. No one can argue with a capacity issue.

But you are not a capacity issue.

Unless you’ve got a green light blinking on your forehead and an Ethernet cable plugged into your spine, you don’t have bandwidth. You have a breaking point.

And there’s nothing inefficient about that.

Commodifying our mental energy isn’t sophistication; it’s a kind of avoidance we’ve all learned because it keeps things smooth. It’s a way to keep things frictionless, to avoid the small, uncomfortable honesty of saying what’s actually true.

When I hit a wall working on something, nothing is “crashing.” I’m just tired—sometimes more than I expected. When my legs burn after a long ride, it’s not a system failure—it’s because I pushed too far. When the day slips sideways, sometimes the only fix is to pick up the Stratocaster and make noise until things settle.

That messiness isn’t a bug. It’s the whole point.

We are not dashboards, servers, or neatly optimized systems. We are inconsistent, emotional, occasionally exhausted people trying to get through the day with some measure of grace—and, on a good day, a little kindness for each other.

So if you can’t help someone, try to say so—honestly.

Say, “I’m overwhelmed.” Say, “I don’t have the energy.” Or, if it’s true, say the thing we’re trained to avoid: “I don’t want to take this on.”

It might feel awkward. It might even feel a little vulnerable. That’s because it’s real—and because the other person is, too.

Leave the bandwidth to the Wi-Fi.

I’m Patrick Ball. Stay curious, ask better questions. See you next time.

Comments

Most Popular of All Time

Time Travel, Roving Mics, and Muscle Memory

In this episode, the 2026 Sinkankas Symposium. Let’s get one thing straight: I didn’t arrive in a DeLorean. No flux capacitor, no dramatic lightning strike—just a Saturday parking pass and a name badge. And yet, somewhere between the rotunda doors and the first handshake, it happened anyway. This past Saturday, April 25th, I was transported—effortlessly and completely—back in time at the 20th Annual Sinkankas Symposium on the GIA campus in Carlsbad. Walking into that magnificent main campus rotunda early with my colleagues, Paul Mattlin and Glenn Wargo, felt like wrapping myself in a familiar, gem-encrusted blanket. It was less a building, more a family living room where nobody ever really forgets your name. The halls were quiet (a rare and beautiful thing), and the soft echo of our footsteps on the polished floors sounded exactly as I remembered it. For a moment, it wasn’t 2026—it was April 1997, my first time walking onto the beautiful, brand-new GIA campus as Director of Alumni. Som...

Confidently Wrong: The Art of the AI Tall Tale

In this episode, A chat with Adamas the Chef on hidden recipes causing digital hallucinations. Pull up a chair and pour yourself a fresh cup of coffee—and please, for your own sake, taste it first. We need to have a quiet chat about why your computer sometimes decides to reinvent reality with the confidence of a five-star chef who has clearly lost his mind. In the world of technology, we call it a  hallucination . It sounds pretty dramatic, doesn’t it? As if the computer decided to ignore your instructions altogether in favor of a vivid, technicolor imagination that simply hasn’t met reality yet. But in truth, an AI hallucination isn’t a breakdown; it’s just a very confident, very polite mistake. Think of it like our friend Adamas , the Chef. Adamas is a master of the kitchen, but he is also a bit of a romantic who refuses to say “I don’t know.” When you ask him for a classic recipe he hasn’t made in years, he doesn’t stop to consult a cookbook—that’s far too pedestrian. Instead, ...

Ode To Gemology

For over 80 years, students of gemology have struggled with spectrums, bewildered by birefringence, and simply plagued by pleochroism. The following sonnet is guaranteed to bring a smile to your face, a glow to your heart, and a simple reminder that students of life and gemology rediscover nature's gifts every day.  Ode to Gemology , by a GIA on-campus student. Dispersion, fire, adventurescence. Orient, sheen, or iridescence. Refractive index, high or low. The luster should indicate that, you know. Polarization, double or single. What to do now, they intermingle. Pleochroic colors you really should see. Was that only two, or actually three? Birefringence should help you a lot. Use your polarizer and watch the spot. Now, did it jump most on low or high? Sure, you can get it if you really try! Your liquids should be an aid, I think. Does it float, suspend, or slowly sink? Just use your imagination now. (He doesn't see me wiping my brow.) Solid inclusions or only bubbles? Huh, th...