Skip to main content

Autumn Baseball

Oakland Coliseum
Baseball is a game of numbers, or is it? The leaves on the maple trees on our street have begun to drop, the lingering daylight is beginning to recede, light rains cool the air, its inevitable, the first sign that fall is on it’s way. Kids are back in school, Labor Day is upon us, and my Cubs, with 25 regular season games left have virtually no chance (again) at the playoffs (see Catching Lightning). Wait till next year. The lazy days of summer are but a memory and the 2013 baseball season is winding down. Will this season prove that big money buys a pennant winner, or just lucrative losers?

This year I chalked up another stadium on my list of major league baseball parks visited (complete list below). After reading the book Money Ball: The Art of Winning an Unfair Game, seeing the Oakland Athletics was a must. It's the story of how Billy Bean, General Manager of the Oakland A's changed the game of baseball using the statistical work of Bill James. Now granted, the Oakland Coliseum is no Wrigley Field but it does hold a place in baseball history. The 2002 season was historic for the A’s - a winning streak of 20 consecutive games. During the 20th game, cruising along with an 11-0 lead, the A's blew it. The Royals rallied to tie the score on a two-out, RBI single by Luis Alicea in the top of the ninth, the Athletics won in dramatic fashion, a walk-off, the bottom half of the ninth, for the third straight game. Oakland broke a three-way tie for the longest winning streak in AL history with the 1906 Chicago White Sox and the 1947 New York Yankees. For those interested, the major league record of 26 consecutive victories was set by the New York Giants in 1916.

 The premise of Moneyball is to answer the question, "How did one of the poorest teams in baseball, the Oakland A's, win so many games?" The author does this by comparing the payrolls and unfair advantage between the Oakland A's and the New York Yankees, well, I’d like to look closer to home - the American League West. The 2013 Angels (see Angels 10 Tigers 0) have a payroll of $127,896,250 compare this to the A’s, $60,864,500. That’s over twice as much. This year there are three teams with lower payrolls than the A's: Tampa Bay Rays, Miami Marlins, and Houston Astros (average $38,939,257).

The stats as of September 2, 2013 are very telling (had to throw in my Padres and Cubs for comparison);

       Team
   W
       L
     PCT
   GB
   Home
   Road
      Oakland
   78
      58
     .574
     1
   42-25
   36-33
      Angels
   63
      72
     .467
    15.5
   31-37
   32-35
      Padres
   60
      76
     .441
    21
   36-32
   24-44
      Cubs
   58
      78
     .426
    21
   27-42
   31-36












In April, sports broadcasters could not stop raving about the Angels and their powerhouse lineup; Albert Pujols, Josh Hamilton, Mike Trout, and Mark Trumbo, to name a few. Google, Pujols, today, (for example) and the headlines say, Albert Pujols healthy enough to golf . According to Pete Donovan of the Desert Sun, "This may not be the worst Angel team of all-time (the ’80 club was 30 games under .500), but it’s surely the most embarrassing based on preseason predictions.”

 On the opposite side of the dugout is the Oakland A’s. To this day, I'm unable to name an Oakland player from memory. However, if you happen to attend an A's game the cheer, during each at bat, is for their beloved catcher, "DEREK - Norris - DEREK - Norris!" The headlines for today read, The A's take back the AL West. During our visit to the Coliseum we witnessed scrappy play, and the raw enthusiasm of the Oakland fans, this made baseball fun again. And why not, they were winning. The game we attended, Oakland won (Indians 3 - Oakland 7). 

Now, deep down, I’m a National league fan at heart, (put the pitcher in the batters box) however, I love the game of baseball and truly enjoy watching the season unfold. Let’s face reality, teams play 162 games a year, it's not over yet!

The 1951 Giants came back to beat the the Dodgers after trailing by 12 1⁄2 games and as a result they were already looking ahead to face the New York Yankees in the 1951 World Series; the Associated Press commented on their dominance, saying that "unless they completely fold in their last 50 games, they're in." The Giants won 16 straight games from August 12 to August 27, cutting their deficit from 12 1⁄2 games to six. By September 20, the Dodgers had ten games left to play while the Giants had seven, and the Dodgers had a 4 1⁄2 game advantage, making a pennant win appear imminent. However, the Giants won their last seven games, and in the final game of the season, the Dodgers needed to defeat the Phillies to force a playoff; they did so by winning 9–8 in 14 innings, which meant both teams had a record of 96-58. The most talked about playoff game among baseball aficionados, the 1951 Dodgers and Giants resonates thru history, Bobby Thompson's, shot heard round the world! Giants 5 Dodgers 4.

 According to the Postseason probabilities chart at MLB.com as of Sept. 2, the A's have a 97% chance of getting to the playoffs this year. It would be epic to see the Dodgers battle the Oakland A’s in a 2013 World Series (sorry Angel fans). What’s the statistical probability of that match-up?  Who knows really - it's baseball, there are 30 teams, anything can happen.

Major League Ballparks visited; Fenway Park, *Shea Stadium, Yankee Stadium (original), Citizens Bank Park, Comerica Park, Wrigley Field, Bush Stadium, Kauffman Stadium, Ballpark at Arlington, Coors Field, Safco Field, AT&T Park, *Candlestick Park, Oakland Coliseum, Dodger Stadium, Angel Stadium, *Qualcomm, and Petco Park.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Most Popular of All Time

Time Travel, Roving Mics, and Muscle Memory

In this episode, the 2026 Sinkankas Symposium. Let’s get one thing straight: I didn’t arrive in a DeLorean. No flux capacitor, no dramatic lightning strike—just a Saturday parking pass and a name badge. And yet, somewhere between the rotunda doors and the first handshake, it happened anyway. This past Saturday, April 25th, I was transported—effortlessly and completely—back in time at the 20th Annual Sinkankas Symposium on the GIA campus in Carlsbad. Walking into that magnificent main campus rotunda early with my colleagues, Paul Mattlin and Glenn Wargo, felt like wrapping myself in a familiar, gem-encrusted blanket. It was less a building, more a family living room where nobody ever really forgets your name. The halls were quiet (a rare and beautiful thing), and the soft echo of our footsteps on the polished floors sounded exactly as I remembered it. For a moment, it wasn’t 2026—it was April 1997, my first time walking onto the beautiful, brand-new GIA campus as Director of Alumni. Som...
Post a Comment
Read more

Confidently Wrong: The Art of the AI Tall Tale

In this episode, A chat with Adamas the Chef on hidden recipes causing digital hallucinations. Pull up a chair and pour yourself a fresh cup of coffee—and please, for your own sake, taste it first. We need to have a quiet chat about why your computer sometimes decides to reinvent reality with the confidence of a five-star chef who has clearly lost his mind. In the world of technology, we call it a  hallucination . It sounds pretty dramatic, doesn’t it? As if the computer decided to ignore your instructions altogether in favor of a vivid, technicolor imagination that simply hasn’t met reality yet. But in truth, an AI hallucination isn’t a breakdown; it’s just a very confident, very polite mistake. Think of it like our friend Adamas , the Chef. Adamas is a master of the kitchen, but he is also a bit of a romantic who refuses to say “I don’t know.” When you ask him for a classic recipe he hasn’t made in years, he doesn’t stop to consult a cookbook—that’s far too pedestrian. Instead, ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Ode To Gemology

For over 80 years, students of gemology have struggled with spectrums, bewildered by birefringence, and simply plagued by pleochroism. The following sonnet is guaranteed to bring a smile to your face, a glow to your heart, and a simple reminder that students of life and gemology rediscover nature's gifts every day.  Ode to Gemology , by a GIA on-campus student. Dispersion, fire, adventurescence. Orient, sheen, or iridescence. Refractive index, high or low. The luster should indicate that, you know. Polarization, double or single. What to do now, they intermingle. Pleochroic colors you really should see. Was that only two, or actually three? Birefringence should help you a lot. Use your polarizer and watch the spot. Now, did it jump most on low or high? Sure, you can get it if you really try! Your liquids should be an aid, I think. Does it float, suspend, or slowly sink? Just use your imagination now. (He doesn't see me wiping my brow.) Solid inclusions or only bubbles? Huh, th...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Cowardice of Corporate Jargon

Picture this: an email lands in your inbox. A colleague—maybe even a friend—needs a favor, a second set of eyes, a moment of your time. You sigh, stare at the glow of your monitor, and type: “I’d love to help, but I just don’t have the bandwidth right now.” Hit send. Problem solved. Conscience clear. Except it shouldn’t be. Most of us have said or sent that line at least once, hoping it would land gently. On the surface, it’s perfect—efficient, polite, even self-aware. And that’s exactly the problem. It lets you decline without ever quite telling the truth. You didn’t just say no; you softened the discomfort of being human until it barely felt like a feeling at all. Instead of admitting, I’m overwhelmed , or I don’t have the energy , you reach for the sterile vocabulary of a server room. You turn a feeling into a metric. A boundary into a system limitation. Apologies, my data transfer rate is capped. Please submit a ticket to my emotional help desk. It’s a clever little trick—and an un...
Post a Comment
Read more