Skip to main content

The AI Debate Was Settled in 1954

In this episode, what a 70-year-old sci-fi mystery teaches us.

Welcome back to On the Fly.

I’ve been looking for a clear way to explain how we should be handling Artificial Intelligence today. I finally found the answer hidden in a book I just finished. The twist? It was written more than seventy years ago.

Isaac Asimov's The Caves of Steel was published in 1954, when a computer filled an entire room, consumed enough electricity to dim the neighborhood, and had roughly the computing power of today's microwave. Yet Asimov set his story nearly 3,000 years in the future—a world where humanity lives in sprawling enclosed cities (New York) and depends on advanced technology for nearly every aspect of daily life.

The remarkable part isn't how much of the technology he imagined.

It's how accurately he predicted us.

In Asimov's future, society struggles with the introduction of highly sophisticated humanoid robots powered by "positronic brains." Naturally, a loud and passionate group called the Medievalists is convinced that these robots will steal everyone's jobs, destroy human culture, and render people obsolete.

Their solution? Destroy the robots and go back to the "good old days.”

Apparently, every generation believes the future peaked about five minutes before the present.

Sound familiar? Here we are in 2026, having the exact same argument about Artificial Intelligence. Asimov called them Medievalists. Today we might call them Analog Purists, Tech-Doomers, or people who proudly proclaim they'll "never use AI" while asking Google Maps how to get to the grocery store and letting autocorrect quietly rescue every third text message.

Some insist that if a project wasn't produced through three sleepless nights, four cups of coffee, and one mild existential crisis, then it can't possibly have any value.

The technology changes. The panic never does.

To be fair, this reaction is deeply human. Every generation is convinced that this new invention is the one that's finally going to ruin civilization.

The printing press. The steam engine. Calculators. The internet. Smartphones. AI.

We've been predicting the end of humanity with remarkable consistency. Humanity, meanwhile, keeps refusing to cooperate.

But Asimov wasn't interested in making fun of fear. He didn't just want to mock the panic; he wanted to force a Medievalist to confront it. So, he wrote a murder mystery.

At its heart, The Caves of Steel follows human detective Elijah Baley as he investigates alongside an advanced robot named R. Daneel Olivaw.

Baley hates the assignment. He distrusts robots, questions every conclusion Daneel reaches, and spends much of the investigation trying to prove the machine is missing something obvious.

Then something inconvenient happens.

Reality.

Baley discovers he cannot solve the case without Daneel's flawless memory, relentless logic, and incredible processing power. At the same time, Daneel cannot solve it without Baley's understanding of people—the messy emotions, hidden motivations, irrational decisions, and creative leaps that make humans both frustrating and fascinating.

Neither succeeds alone. Together, they become far more capable than either could be alone.

That's the lesson I hope you'll carry with you.

As you move through school and into your career, you'll encounter people who want to fight the tools rather than learn them. They'll tell you AI is coming for every job, every profession, and probably even your weekend hobbies, while they're happily using algorithms to choose their music, recommend their next movie, and filter spam from their inbox.

Don't become a Medievalist.

Before the sun comes up, my early-morning routine is stubbornly analog. I warm up at the piano or play a few fingerstyle chords on my Taylor guitar to steady my mind and sharpen my creative focus. But right alongside those deeply physical, human rituals, I sit down with advanced AI. Not because it does my thinking for me, but because it's an outstanding brainstorming partner. It patiently organizes half-baked ideas, asks useful questions, catches blind spots, and never rolls its eyes when I rewrite the same paragraph ten times.

It doesn't replace my creativity. It amplifies it.

The people who succeed over the next decade won't be those trying to out-compute computers. They'll be those who learn to combine uniquely human judgment, curiosity, empathy, and creativity with machine speed and analysis.

You probably won't lose your job to AI. You might lose it to someone who knows how to work with AI.

Asimov saw this coming in 1954. The debate was never really about artificial intelligence. It was about whether humans would choose fear or adaptation.

The goal has never been human versus machine. The real magic happens when human intuition and machine logic stop arguing and start working together.

I’m Patrick Ball. Until next time, ask better questions and keep moving forward.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Most Popular of All Time

The Gopher Problem and the High Powered Solution

Vacationing in Maine this week, just a short drive down the coast from Freeport, it is hard not to think about the outsized impact one frustrated outdoorsman had on the gear we all use today. Bad equipment can ruin a perfectly good day on the water or the trail, but it takes a special kind of vision to turn cold feet into a century-old empire. This is the story of the company we now know as L.L.Bean, but more importantly, it is a masterclass in integrity, learning from failure, and standing behind your work. In 1912, Leon Leonwood Bean faced a persistent problem: returning from expeditions in the Maine woods with cold, wet feet. Instead of complaining, he got creative. He had a local shoemaker stitch waterproof rubber soles onto the flexible leather uppers of a hunting boot. He called it the Maine Hunting Shoe and mailed a flyer promising perfect satisfaction. Then reality arrived. Ninety of his first 100 pairs failed when the rubber separated from the leather. Not an effective product...
Post a Comment
Read more

Beyond Facts-The Deep Dive

✨ In this episode, Beyond Facts: Reimagining School–in the Age of AI . . .   This week's podcast is a bit different; it's another example of how Artificial Intelligence (AI) can offer tools to creatively enhance your analytical presentation of information. We took this week's blog and copied it into Gemini with the question, “If a story is to work, it must, on some level, create an illusion of escape and also achieve a goal simultaneously. Does this apply to my blog post that follows?” What's created is not just an analysis of the writing, but an AI-generated discussion produced “On the Fly” - Enjoy! Did you know that the word "school" comes from the ancient Greek word scholē , which originally meant "leisure"? Not a rigid schedule or droning lectures filled with "facts," but free time for thinking and conversation. To the Greeks, learning happened best when life slowed down—when you had room to reflect, to ask questions, and to wrestle ...
4 comments
Read more

Stamps and Snow

In this episode, Stamps and Snow . . .   You don’t usually walk into the local Post Office expecting a time warp . . . but here we are. All we wanted were stamps for this year's Christmas cards— yes, the old-fashioned paper ones that require licking, sticking, and hoping the Postal Service is feeling ambitious this week. But holiday errands have a talent for slowing you down, almost like the universe whispering, “Relax. You’re not getting out of this line any faster anyway.” So we waited. And while we waited, we talked (Are you surprised?). Because the Post Office is one of the few places where people still look up from their phones long enough to talk . . . Maybe it's because they're holding packages. It’s the modern town square: part civic duty, part free entertainment, part sociology experiment. The discussion began with holiday specials streaming on Netflix, Paramount+, and other services during this time of year. One gentleman who has lived in Vista since 1958 told us,...
3 comments
Read more

A Dog, a Beer . . . and the Ghost of 1912

Whenever you step into an American cathedral of our National Pastime built before modern ergonomics, municipal zoning, or crowd-flow dynamics, an unspoken understanding forms, creating a welcoming, timeless atmosphere. You trade legroom, sensible corridors, and personal space for the privilege of communing with ghosts. Last week, Lori and I made our pilgrimage to Fenway Park to watch our Chicago Cubs take on the Boston Red Sox (a taut 0–2 contest that felt spiritually tied to their 1918 World Series meeting). Staying just across the Charles River at the Courtyard Marriott in Cambridge gave us one immeasurable tactical advantage: we walked. While the automotive gridlock around Kenmore Square took on the character of the Siege of Yorktown—horns echoing across the asphalt like musket fire—we simply strolled across the Boston University Bridge, enjoying the river breeze and feeling smugly superior to everyone trapped behind a steering wheel. Fenway, built in the spring of 1912, holds rough...
Post a Comment
Read more