Skip to main content

Baseball's New Rules

In this episode – Baseball's New Rules . . .

In the final out in a Major League Baseball (MLB) spring training game on Saturday, February 25, 2023, the Atlanta Braves and Boston Red Sox ended in a 6–6 tie after Braves player Cal Conley struck out for not getting set in the batter's box "in time."

Yes, baseball is back. Spring training began on February 24, 2023, with a few new rules. Let's face it - it's a game, and don't you adjust the rules when you play a game to suit the players? Major League Baseball did this year for a few good reasons.

Look at the end of the first paragraph of this post, "In time." That's not a phrase you often hear connected with baseball; get used to it because baseball has entered a new era this season. Overly concerned it's getting overshadowed by faster-paced sports. This year's goal is to speed up the game and generate more offense. These rules include the following; 

  • A pitch clock so pitchers (and hitters) can't lollygag between pitches. Pitchers will have 15 seconds to throw a pitch with empty bases and 20 seconds with a runner on base. Hitters must be in the batter's box with eight seconds on the pitch clock. How will this be enforced: If a pitcher has not started "the motion to deliver a pitch" before the clock's expiration, he will be charged with a ball. If a batter pauses too long before entering the box, he will be charged with a strike.
  • Number two; The elimination of extreme defensive shifts to encourage more offense. This one was way overdue! The radical defense shifts in the past few years because the millions of stats recorded on each player were bogus. Without this shift, players will be "engaged" - their athletic ability will be fully displayed! Watching a third baseman shift to a position between second and first base was ridiculous. They left a gaping hole at the 5.5 positions that hitters could not find! Last season watching Freddie Freeman of the Dodgers get base hits through that hole was hilarious. At the same time, most batters grounded out into the shift. Were they blind, stubborn, or just victims of poor bat control? With the defense perfectly positioned, players just stood there, raised their gloves, caught the ball, and threw out the batter - simple. How boring was that! You gotta love this quote: "My biggest complaint about the shift is, how do you explain it to kids?" Phillies reliever David Robertson said. "What's the point of having a shortstop if he can't play shortstop?" 
  • Number three; Bigger bases to increase the number of stolen bases. The size of the bases has been increased from 15 to 18 inches. Common . . . it's speed, desire, and cunning that defines a stolen base leader. Rickey Henderson holds the MLB career stolen base record with 1,406. He's the only MLB player to have reached this 1,000 stolen bases milestone. Let's ask Rickey about the size of the new bases.
  • Finally, Limit the number of mound "disengagements" as pickoff throws. Pickoff throws, huh some pitchers approach pickoffs like an elephant crossing a road, slow and deliberately. Pitch the ball, for heaven's sake, don't just stand there!
  • Yes, I'm sure it will take some getting used to, and there will be a lot of critics. On Friday, San Diego Padres star Manny Machado became the first MLB player to begin an at-bat down 0–1 in the count for stepping into the batter's box "too late."

According to ESPN, the big picture: Fans who love baseball but can't justify spending three-plus hours watching it, these could be welcome changes. Oh, that same Padres–Mariners game on Friday took just 2:29 minutes to complete—about 40 minutes shorter than last year's regular-season average.


It's a new season with 162 games to play – let's see how all this shakes out.


I'm Patrick Ball; thanks for listening; see you in the next episode.

Comments

Most Popular of All Time

Time Travel, Roving Mics, and Muscle Memory

In this episode, the 2026 Sinkankas Symposium. Let’s get one thing straight: I didn’t arrive in a DeLorean. No flux capacitor, no dramatic lightning strike—just a Saturday parking pass and a name badge. And yet, somewhere between the rotunda doors and the first handshake, it happened anyway. This past Saturday, April 25th, I was transported—effortlessly and completely—back in time at the 20th Annual Sinkankas Symposium on the GIA campus in Carlsbad. Walking into that magnificent main campus rotunda early with my colleagues, Paul Mattlin and Glenn Wargo, felt like wrapping myself in a familiar, gem-encrusted blanket. It was less a building, more a family living room where nobody ever really forgets your name. The halls were quiet (a rare and beautiful thing), and the soft echo of our footsteps on the polished floors sounded exactly as I remembered it. For a moment, it wasn’t 2026—it was April 1997, my first time walking onto the beautiful, brand-new GIA campus as Director of Alumni. Som...

Confidently Wrong: The Art of the AI Tall Tale

In this episode, A chat with Adamas the Chef on hidden recipes causing digital hallucinations. Pull up a chair and pour yourself a fresh cup of coffee—and please, for your own sake, taste it first. We need to have a quiet chat about why your computer sometimes decides to reinvent reality with the confidence of a five-star chef who has clearly lost his mind. In the world of technology, we call it a  hallucination . It sounds pretty dramatic, doesn’t it? As if the computer decided to ignore your instructions altogether in favor of a vivid, technicolor imagination that simply hasn’t met reality yet. But in truth, an AI hallucination isn’t a breakdown; it’s just a very confident, very polite mistake. Think of it like our friend Adamas , the Chef. Adamas is a master of the kitchen, but he is also a bit of a romantic who refuses to say “I don’t know.” When you ask him for a classic recipe he hasn’t made in years, he doesn’t stop to consult a cookbook—that’s far too pedestrian. Instead, ...

Ode To Gemology

For over 80 years, students of gemology have struggled with spectrums, bewildered by birefringence, and simply plagued by pleochroism. The following sonnet is guaranteed to bring a smile to your face, a glow to your heart, and a simple reminder that students of life and gemology rediscover nature's gifts every day.  Ode to Gemology , by a GIA on-campus student. Dispersion, fire, adventurescence. Orient, sheen, or iridescence. Refractive index, high or low. The luster should indicate that, you know. Polarization, double or single. What to do now, they intermingle. Pleochroic colors you really should see. Was that only two, or actually three? Birefringence should help you a lot. Use your polarizer and watch the spot. Now, did it jump most on low or high? Sure, you can get it if you really try! Your liquids should be an aid, I think. Does it float, suspend, or slowly sink? Just use your imagination now. (He doesn't see me wiping my brow.) Solid inclusions or only bubbles? Huh, th...

The Cowardice of Corporate Jargon

Picture this: an email lands in your inbox. A colleague—maybe even a friend—needs a favor, a second set of eyes, a moment of your time. You sigh, stare at the glow of your monitor, and type: “I’d love to help, but I just don’t have the bandwidth right now.” Hit send. Problem solved. Conscience clear. Except it shouldn’t be. Most of us have said or sent that line at least once, hoping it would land gently. On the surface, it’s perfect—efficient, polite, even self-aware. And that’s exactly the problem. It lets you decline without ever quite telling the truth. You didn’t just say no; you softened the discomfort of being human until it barely felt like a feeling at all. Instead of admitting, I’m overwhelmed , or I don’t have the energy , you reach for the sterile vocabulary of a server room. You turn a feeling into a metric. A boundary into a system limitation. Apologies, my data transfer rate is capped. Please submit a ticket to my emotional help desk. It’s a clever little trick—and an un...